MGMT 824: Topics in Macroeconomics
Yale SOM Spring 2
Tu/Thu 240-400
(last updated: 2019.5.7)
A. Introduction
This
course explores topics beyond those covered in the SOM MBA macro core, including
long-run growth (e.g., the Solow model), international trade and exchange
rates. As with core macro, this course will survey a variety of models and
discuss how these models might be useful for understanding current events in
both business and policy.
B. Office
Hours
If you would
like to meet outside of class, please email me (peter.schott@yale.edu) a few times that
work for you and I will pick one. Please feel free to email questions at any
time.
C. Calendar
The schedule below outlines the order in
which we will cover models, and the associated timing of readings and problem
set assignments. Note that ABC and YGE correspond to the Abel et al.
Macroeconomic textbook used in SOM core macro and a textbook being developed by
the Yale Economics Department, respectively. The latter is
located in /files/textbook on canvas. Numbers in parentheses refer to
chapters.
ABC=Abel, Bernanke and Crushore,
any edition after 9, the text used in Core Macro.
YGE=The Global Economy: A View from Yale (in
/files/textbook)
D. Textbook
This course
does not have a required textbook, but here are some recommendations:
Growth: Chapter 6 of Abel,
Bernanke and Crushore (ABC), the text we used in the
macro core.
Trade: TBA
Industrial Policy: “One Economics, Many
Recipes” by Dani Rodrik
E. Meetings
Class
meetings will be a mixture of lecture and discussion. I expect the students to
have reviewed the slides or case we will cover before coming to class.
F. Assignments
and Grading
There will be
four graded assignments, spaced two weeks apart, all equally weighted.
Note that I
re-use assignments over time. It is a violation of academic integrity to rely on any work from prior iterations of
this or any related course in working on your assignments for this iteration of
the course.
G. Academic
Integrity
No student’s name should appear on a
group project if the student has not contributed to the production of the
project. The following is an example of
unacceptable conduct: Neo agrees to
produce a case write-up, putting Trinity’s name on the case write-up. Trinity agrees to repay Neo by producing a subsequent
assignment on his own.
In group work, all group members are
responsible for the integrity of work that is submitted. Group members should always question other
members about the source of material and analysis that is being included in
group projects. If a group member has
any concerns about the integrity of material being submitted by the group, that
group member should discuss those concerns with the instructor.
H. Plagiarism
The members of any academic community are
expected not to present ideas or material from other sources as their own. In
the context of this course, it is acceptable to, for example:
·
Refer to
concepts, frameworks, and analytical tools from the readings or class lectures
without citation. For example, you may refer to the five forces, added value,
sustainable competitive advantage, signaling, and so on without citing the
source.
·
Refer to the
material in cases without citations. For example, you do not need to cite the
HBS case in your case analysis when you refer to factual
information from the text or tables.
·
However, it
is not acceptable to quote or paraphrase analysis from another source and
present it as your own. For example, it would be unacceptable to find an
analysis of your case project company on the web and quote or paraphrase it in
the analysis you hand in without correctly attributing it. There is a
difference between consulting a source and then forming your own opinion based
on what you have read, and “lifting” material directly.
[SP1]Hi Professor Schott –
I happened
upon this 2007 Romer podcast yesterday during a long drive – thought it was a
great / simple synthesis of the key principles of his growth model. He also
discusses China / trade: http://www.econtalk.org/romer-on-growth/
The talk
also includes his thoughts on business schools and how it’s different from
other grad schools in that it’s very customer driven –
SOM gets a shout-out for doing a curriculum re-design! It’s also pretty funny to listen to their contemplations on impending
launch of the iPhone as this was done before the launch of the product in 2007.
Thought it
might be helpful for next year’s class -
Best,
Amy
Amy Zhu
MBA
Candidate | Class of 2019 | Yale School of Management
513.818.5157
(new!) | amy.zhu@yale.edu | LinkedIn